Universal Containers’ org is complex but well-organized in unlocked packages with their dependencies. The development team was asked for a new feature, and the package that will be changed has already been identified. Which environment should be used for this development?

A. A Developer Pro sandbox with all packages installed.

B. A scratch org with all installed packages

C. A Developer Pro sandbox with the package code that will be changed and its dependencies installed.

D. A scratch org with the package code that will be changed and its dependencies

Explanation:
The best environment for developing a new feature in an org with unlocked packages is a scratch org with the package code that will be changed and its dependencies. A scratch org is a source-driven and disposable deployment of Salesforce code and metadata that is fully configurable and can be created quickly. A scratch org can also install unlocked packages and their dependencies, which can help ensure compatibility and functionality of the new feature. A Developer Pro sandbox is not a good option, as it is not source-driven and can have outdated or conflicting data and metadata.

Universal Containers uses multiple Salesforce orgs for its different lines of business (LOBs). In a recent analysis, the architect found that UC could have a more complete view of its customers by gathering customer data from different orgs. What two options can an architect recommend to accomplish the customer 360-degree view? (Choose 2 answers)

A. Implement a Complete Graph multi-org strategy by allowing each org to connect directly to every other, reading and writing customer data from the orgs where it has been originally created.

B. Migrate from multi-org to single-org strategy, consolidating customer data in the process.

C. Implement a Single Package multi-org strategy by developing and deploying to all orgs a managed package which reads and consolidates customer 360-degree view from the different orgs.

D. Implement a Hub-and-Spoke multi-org strategy by consolidating customer data In a single org, which will be the master of customer data, and using integration strategies to let the LOBs orgs read and write from it.

Explanation:
Implementing a Hub-and-Spoke multi-org strategy by consolidating customer data in a single org, which will be the master of customer data, and using integration strategies to let the LOBs orgs read and write from it is one of the options an architect can recommend to accomplish the customer 360-degree view. This way, the architect can ensure that there is a single source of truth for the customer data, and that the data is consistent and synchronized across the different orgs. Implementing a Single Package multi-org strategy by developing and deploying to all orgs a managed package which reads and consolidates customer 360-degree view from the different orgs is another option an architect can recommend, as it allows the architect to create a reusable and scalable solution that can provide a unified view of the customer data from multiple sources. Implementing a Complete Graph multi-org strategy or migrating from multi-org to single-org strategy are not feasible or optimal options, as they can introduce complexity, cost, or risk to the architecture.

Universal Containers (UC) is developing a custom Force.com application. The following tools are used for development, the Force.com IDE for developing apps. Git as a source control system and a Git repository, and the Force.com Migration Tool for updating sandboxes from source control. UC's current branching strategy calls for two main branches: 1) Master 2) Develop Three supporting branches: 1) Feature 2) Release 3) Hotflix Consider that the branching strategy is in parallel as follows Feature |Develop |Release |Hotfix |Master What is the recommended practice strategy that Developers should adopt for Development?

A. Developers work off of the Feature branch, which is pulled from the Master branch and the Feature branch is then merged with the Develop branch.

B. Developers work off of the Feature branch, which is pulled from the Develop branch, and the Feature branch is then merged with the Develop branch.

C. Developers work off of the Feature branch, which is pulled from the Release branch, and the Feature branch is then merged with the Develop branch.

D. Developers work off of the Feature branch, which is pulled from the Develop branch, and the Feature branch is then merged with the Hotfix branch.

B. Developers work off of the Feature branch, which is pulled from the Develop branch, and the Feature branch is then merged with the Develop branch.

Explanation: This is the correct answer because developers should work on feature branches that are derived from the develop branch, which represents the latest stable version of the code. The feature branches should then be merged back into the develop branch after they are completed and tested. This way, the develop branch always contains the most updated code that is ready for release.

Sales and Service products will be created by two teams that will use second-generation managed package(s). The Sales team will use a specific function of the Service product, but the architect wants to ensure that this team will only use the functions exposed by the Service team. No other team will use these same functions. What should an architect recommend?

A. Create two second generation managed packages with the same namespace and set the methods that should be shared with the @namespaceAccessible annotation.

B. Create two managed packages with Sales and service namespaces. Set the methods to be shared with the ©salesAccessible annotation

C. Create a managed package with both products and create a code review process with an approver from each team.

D. Create two managed packages. Create an authentication function in the Service package that will return a token if a Sales user is authorized to call the exposed function. Validate the token in the Service functions.

A. Create two second generation managed packages with the same namespace and set the methods that should be shared with the @namespaceAccessible annotation.

Explanation:
The architect should recommend creating two second generation managed packages with the same namespace and setting the methods that should be shared with the @namespaceAccessible annotation. This will allow the Sales team to access the specific functions of the Service product without exposing them to other teams or customers. Creating two managed packages with different namespaces will not allow the Sales team to access the Service functions, unless they are declared as global, which will expose them to everyone. Creating a managed package with both products will not allow the separation of the products and the control of the functions. Creating an authentication function in the Service package will add unnecessary complexity and overhead to the solution.

Universal Containers (UC) currently uses the org development model and utilizes the Salesforce CLI as the deployment tool. After the feature release artifact (a .zip file) has been tested in a lower sandbox, it is being deployed to the full sandbox for performance testing and production deployment readiness check-Since quick deployment options are not being used, what is the correct way to deploy the artifact to the full sandbox?

A. Authorize to the Full sandbox org; Validate with sfdx:source:deploy; On successful validation, deploy with sfdx:source:deploy

B. Authorize to the Fullsandbox org; Validate with sfdximdapi:deploy; On successful validation, deploy with sfdx:mdapi:deploy

C. Authorize to the Full sandbox; validate with sfdx: source: deploy; On successful validation, deploy with sfdx;mdapi;deploy

D. Authorize to the Full sandbox org; Validate with sfdx:mdapi:deploy; On successful validation, deploy with sfdx:source:deploy

B. Authorize to the Fullsandbox org; Validate with sfdximdapi:deploy; On successful validation, deploy with sfdx:mdapi:deploy

Explanation:
The correct way to deploy the artifact to the full sandbox is to authorize to the full sandbox org, validate with sfdx:mdapi:deploy, and on successful validation, deploy with sfdx:mdapi:deploy. This is because the artifact is a .zip file, which is in the metadata API format, and not the source format. Therefore, the sfdx:mdapi:deploy command should be used instead of the sfdx:source:deploy command. See Deploy Metadata Using Metadata API for more details.

Salesforce-Platform-Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect Practice Test

Question No 221

Question No 220

Question No 219

Question No 218

Question No 217