A mule application exposes and API forcreating payments. An Operations team wants to
ensure that the Payment API is up and running at all times in production.
Which approach should be used to test that the payment API is working in production?
A. Create a health check endpoint that listens ona separate port and uses a separate
HTTP Listener configuration from the API
B. Configure the application to send health data to an external system
C. Create a health check endpoint that reuses the same port number and HTTP Listener
configuration as the API itself
D. Monitor the Payment API directly sending real customer payment data
A. Create a health check endpoint that listens ona separate port and uses a separate
HTTP Listener configuration from the API
Explanation:
To ensure the Payment API is up and running in production, the best approach is:
✅ A. Create a health check endpoint that listens on a separate port and uses a separate HTTP Listener configuration from the API. Why a health check endpoint: A health check endpoint is a standard practice to monitor the availability and operational status of an API without impacting its core functionality. It provides a lightweight way to verify the API's health (e.g., connectivity, dependencies, and runtime status) without processing sensitive or real data.
Why a separate port and HTTP Listener: Using a separate port and HTTP Listener configuration for the health check endpoint isolates it from the main API traffic. This reduces the risk of interference with production traffic, enhances security by limiting exposure, and allows independent scaling or monitoring of the health check. It also ensures the health check is not affected by issues like API throttling or authentication requirements.
❌ Why not the other options:
B. Configure the application to send health data to an external system: While sending health data to an external system (e.g., monitoring tools like Splunk or New Relic) is useful for observability, it does not directly provide a way for the Operations team to actively check the API's availability in real-time. It’s a passive approach and may require additional setup or dependencies.
C. Create a health check endpoint that reuses the same port number and HTTP Listener configuration as the API itself: Reusing the same port and HTTP Listener mixes health check traffic with production API traffic, which can lead to performance impacts, security risks (e.g., exposing health check details to clients), or complications with authentication and routing. It’s less reliable for isolated monitoring.
D. Monitor the Payment API directly sending real customer payment data: Using real customer payment data for monitoring is highly risky, unethical, and likely violates compliance regulations (e.g., PCI DSS for payment systems). It could also lead to unintended side effects, such as duplicate transactions or data exposure.