Universal Containers (UC) defines a Warranty Period in a field on its Products and wants to ensure that this Warranty Period is correctly stored on the Asset record. A twin field has been created on the Asset record. UC contracts from the Order.
When leveraging the twin field functionality to pass this
Information to the Asset record, on which object should the admin create a twin field?
A. Product Option
B. Order Product
C. Opportunity Product
D. Quote Line
B. Order Product
Explanation:
Key Requirement:
UC wants to pass the Warranty Period (a field on Product) to the Asset record when contracts are generated from an Order.
Twin fields are used to map data between objects during the Order-to-Asset process.
Why Option B (Order Product) is Correct?
Order Product (OrderItem) is the bridge object between:
Product (source of Warranty Period)
Asset (target where the value needs to be stored)
Twin fields must be created on Order Product to map:
Product.Warranty_Period__c → OrderItem.Warranty_Period__c → Asset.Warranty_Period__c
This ensures the field value flows correctly when the Order is activated and Assets are created.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect?
A (Product Option): Used for bundles/components, not for Order-to-Asset mapping.
C (Opportunity Product): Too early in the process; data isn’t passed to Assets from here.
D (Quote Line): Quote data does not directly impact Asset creation (unless synced to Order).