Explanation: Disable Grant Access Using Hierarchies, Create a criteria-based Sharing Rule for the HR Department, and Remove Review Read permission from non-HR profiles. These are correct because disabling Grant Access Using Hierarchies prevents users above the record owner in the role hierarchy from viewing the Review records, creating a criteria-based Sharing Rule for the HR Department allows users in that group to view all Review records, and removing Review Read permission from non-HR profiles prevents users in other profiles from viewing any Review records.

Explanation: The solution that should meet this requirement is updating the support team profile to remove the Bronze record type. This way, the support team users will not be able to create new cases with the Bronze record type, as it will not appear in their record type selection list. Option A is incorrect because updating the organization-wide defaults to private for Case does not affect the record type availability, but rather the record access level. Option C is incorrect because creating permission set group for Case that includes Platinum and Diamond record types does not prevent the support team users from creating new cases with the Bronze record type, as they may still have access to it through their profile. Option D is incorrect because making the record type hidden to support users and updating sharing roles to private does not prevent the support team users from creating new cases with the Bronze record type, as they may still have access to it through their profile.

Explanation: Public group is the best option to route the approval request for overnight shipments. Public groups can include users, roles, or other groups. Queues are used to assign ownership of records to a group of users, not for approval processes. Hierarchy field and role are not flexible enough to include only the department members.

Explanation: The best solution to create a report to compare the number of support cases in each status and by priority is to use grouping. Grouping allows the app builder to summarize data by one or more fields, such as status and priority, and display them in rows and columns. Grouping also enables the app builder to use different chart types, such as stacked bar charts or matrix charts, to visualize the data. Bucket columns are not a suitable solution, as they are used to categorize data into predefined groups, such as high, medium, or low. Custom report types are not a suitable solution, as they are used to define the objects and fields available for a report, not how to display them. Filters are not a suitable solution, as they are used to limit the data shown in a report based on certain criteria, not how to compare them.

Explanation: The app builder should know that a field type change is included in the change set and that it can cause a delay in the deployment. A field type change is a change that modifies the data type of an existing field, such as changing a text field to a number field. A field type change can affect many aspects of Salesforce functionality, such as validation rules, formulas, workflows, reports, dashboards, and more. Therefore, deploying a change set that contains a field type change can take longer than usual and require more testing and verification. Option A, C, and D are not changes that can cause a delay in the deployment.