Universal Containers is in the process of implementing a CPQ and B2B Commerce solution. The Technology team has completed the development for the current sprint and is demonstrating the functionalities to the business stakeholders during their sprint demo. While demonstrating products and pricing, and Sync between B2B and CPQ when requesting a quote, the stakeholders make a new request to include tiered pricing and map it to discount schedules on CPQ.
Which approach should a Solution Architect recommend while addressing the feedback from the stakeholders?
A. Convey that this can be potentially picked up in the next sprint since the technical changes needed for this new user story are low effort.
B. Include it as a user story and accommodate it m the same sprint, since this is a feasible requirement and the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector is already set up.
C. Convey that it is not recommended to include M the initial MVP, since an extension is needed on the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector for the new requirement.
D. Add the request as a new user story to the product backlog, and further schedule a meeting for prioritization and grooming.
D. Add the request as a new user story to the product backlog, and further schedule a meeting for prioritization and grooming.
Explanation:
✅ CPQ B2B Commerce Connector is a tool that synchronizes data from CPQ product and pricing objects to B2B Commerce objects1.
✅ CPQ uses discount schedules and B2B Commerce uses tiered pricing to handle volume-based pricing23.
✅ The connector does not support mapping tiered pricing to discount schedules out of the box23.
✅ The connector uses pricing from B2B Commerce to define the pricing on the generated quote lines by setting their Special Price fields4.